
Which Monday Show Would You Like to See Reviewed
Total Votes: 10
Which Tuesday Show Would You Like to See Reviewed
Total Votes: 9
Which Wednesday Show Would You Like to See Reviewed
Total Votes: 5
Which Thursday Show Would You Like to See Reviewed
Total Votes: 8
Which Friday Show Would You Like to See Reviewed
Total Votes: 8
Which Sunday Show Would You Like to See Reviewed
Total Votes: 5
On Monday, Scott Butki wrote a nice tutorial on writing reviews for TV shows. I thought I'd share a bit of what works for me.
One Viewing vs. Many
While I almost always record a show that I'm going to review, I seldom watch it more than once. I tend to review based on my first impressions. I find that my opinions are usually stronger that way.
However, I do use the recordings to pull dialogue, confirm scenes and check for accuracy – all very important parts of the review.
If you are going to do a more detailed analysis of a show (like this one on Project Runaway or this one on Monk), I can see where rewatching episodes would be important.
Recap vs. review vs. general writings about a show:
Personally I don't read straight recaps. They are pretty boring for someone who has already watched the show. However, I do agree with Scott that you need to do a certain amount of recapping within a review for those that didn't watch (and yes there are people who don't watch a show, but read the review) or missed that reference.
Because your review will contain details about the episode, please be sure to include a spoiler warning. It's just a courtesy.
I think weekly reviews work best with serial dramas (like Heroes, Lost and BSG) and reality shows contests (like American Idol or Dancing with the Stars).
But not all shows need a weekly review, so don't feel the pressure to do so. Other shows can have sporadic reviews about particularly exciting episodes or just general writings about themes, characters or news.
If you are trying to get your article on MSNBC.com through the Entertainment Gateway, I suggest focusing on a particular aspect about a show like a character, a theory or a plot twist rather than a straight review.
Titling Your Review
The title is a very important part of your review. Use it to attract your readers. Use it to highlight the biggest point of your review.
It's easy to list just the show name and episode title in your headline, but you'll get a better response if you give some details in your headline. You might even attract people that haven't yet watched the show.
When to Publish Reviews
Scott is right that we are not full-time writers; therefore, you should publish your review when it's convenient for you.
But that said, I think the sooner after the episode airs that you publish your review, the better opportunity you have for readers. People like to talk about TV shows when they are fresh on their mind.
Some shows are more important for you to publish right away than others. For example, I must publish my review of the American Idol performance show immediately. It is not likely to get many viewers after the results show airs.
On the other hand, a Friday night show like Battlestar Galactica has more staying power and will still be talked about come Monday.
Related Links
It's important that when you write several articles about the same show that you use at least one common tag for all the articles. You can then link to this tag within future reviews to give people access to your other articles on the same show.
For example, in my American Idol articles I always use the tag "American Idol." And in all my AI articles, when I mention the show's title it is a link to all my articles with the same tag.
If you have specific articles that have something in common with the article you are currently writing, you can add a "Related Articles" section at the end of your post like I did with this BSG article.
Reading Other Reviews
I absolutely don't read any other reviews until I've finished my own. I don't want to be influenced by others' opinions.
However, after I post my article I do go in search of other reviews. I might find something I missed. And it is also good fodder for the comment section to relate what I've read elsewhere.
Comments to Your Review
As Scott said, it's important to keep an open mind and be able to handle differing opinions, but just as important is engaging your commenters. Respond to those who comment on your review by stirring up discussions.
I usually keep a couple comments reserved to help elicit discussions. Other times, there's a bit of information or a question that doesn't quite fit in with the rest of the review, I ask it in the comment section.
Adding a Poll
I love polls. They are just an easy way to get interaction so I always try to add a poll to my review. Ask a key question about a particular character or plot twist. Ponder the future of a particular storyline. Ask for opinions on a theory. A poll is a great way to get people involved that might not have the time to comment and it can help to stir up discussions.
Okay, I think that about covers it. I'm happy to answer anyone's questions. But in truth there's no one way to write a review. In fact, that's kind of what makes reviews interesting is that no two are alike. Just write about what interests you and the rest will fall into place.
Tee hee. looks like you and I have rather close watching habits...
Yeah you forgot X-Files....
Well I had to put a plug in for my girl....you know me, I did not want to hurt her feelings..
Thats true, good point......Hey do you know you have two identical articles running, this one and one with no comments.
I think Newsvine was just confused for a min as I had you in two slots on my tracker and also in my history, one with comments and the other without, now only one....strange..
Add me in the "similar watching habits" group...I love all the CSIs (even Miami, it's my braincandy), all the Law and Orders, Criminal Minds, NUMB3RS, House, Bones...and a little Top Chef and Step it Up and Dance at the moment.
Thanks for this, vacelts. Reviews can be tough to write.
"similar watching habits"
Hey thats cheating, when I made my comment there were only 2 votes !
And I sure know that "Ugly Betty" was not one of them......
I tried to get into Ugly Betty, but I couldn't.
I hate to admit, but many of those I had never heard of...
I get a weekly survey from NBC which takes about an hour to do rating their stuff and everyone else in the world..Yikes..I feel like an idiot. 70% of the time I don't know the show...
Thanks for the tips vacelts. I like to use a semi-informal voice in my television show reviews, it gives me a little lee-way to be snarky if necessary. ;)
While I almost always record a show that I'm going to review, I seldom watch it more than once. I tend to review based on my first impressions. I find that my opinions are usually stronger that way.
However, I do use the recordings to pull dialogue, confirm scenes and check for accuracy – all very important parts of the review.
Hmm, I think we're saying the same thing just in different ways. My second viewing of a show is not to see if it works but just to, as you say, "confirm scenes and check for accuracy – all very important parts of the review."
I confess I muted House during some scenes the second time around.
Well, I watched to transcribe exchanges at the start and at the end and I have no objection to muting the sound while I write.
Personally I don't read straight recaps. They are pretty boring for someone who has already watched the show. However, I do agree with Scott that you need to do a certain amount of recapping within a review for those that didn't watch (and yes there are people who don't watch a show, but read the review) or missed that reference
One thing I've been experimenting with my House reviews is a) using subheads more and b) trying to have both general thoughts about the shows in general versus just a straight recap of the show because, as you say, that might not interest the writer. That also helps deal with recapping a weak episode.
If you are trying to get your article on MSNBC.com through the Entertainment Gateway, I suggest focusing on a particular aspect about a show like a character, a theory or a plot twist rather than a straight review.
Vacelts knows what she's talking about here - I beleive she's had the most stories posted on MSNBC and I think the reason for that is this exact detail, which many of us (myself include) too often forget to have, namely a good hook.
Oh and I'm clipping this to Newsviner's Picks and my column.
MSNBC has their own people writing recaps so to stand out and be picked up, you must be talking about a particular point -- a hot discussion, an easter egg, a theory, a plot hole -- something that makes your article more than just the same old review.
What she said.
It is of paramount importance to me that while I only view it once, I wait until the next day. Sleeping on it helps my objectivity. I can't imagine what my ramblings would have looked like had I written the review for the LOST season 3 finale if I had written it right after, "Kate, we have to go back!".
It is of paramount importance to me that while I only view it once, I wait until the next day. Sleeping on it helps my objectivity.
Me too especially with a show like House. I tend to write a rough draft the morning after I watch it when my thoughts have somehow organized themselves while I was sleeping.
I used to have that problem a lot. I think that was part of why I used to have insomnia. And I do still maintain that some of the best writing ideas come as you fall asleep or wake up. But these days I take a medication before bed that among other things helps me sleep. It's powerful enough to cause me to fall asleep mid-story or mid-online backgammon game (much to the consternation of the other player.)
This is good advice but I would rather read your reviews tan write my own.
OK
How did Idol end? Or did i end yet?
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |